[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Collection classes as separate package for java 1.1
From: |
Brian Jones |
Subject: |
Re: Collection classes as separate package for java 1.1 |
Date: |
03 Dec 2000 13:19:40 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 |
"Jochen Hoenicke" <address@hidden> writes:
> On Jun 26, Brian Jones wrote:
ed> > Gnu decided the org.gnu.* part was simply redundant and shortened it to
> > gnu.*. I would probably make it gnu.java.util.collections by default
> > and if it is possible it would be cool to provide the option of
> > packaging it as another package... either hardcoded to the sun package
> > name below or user changeable.
>
> Okay done. COLLECTION_PACKAGE is now a Makefile variable.
>
> Since you have done many changes to Makefile.am, can you review the
> attached patch? I have changed the JAVAC variable to not include the
> java files, so I can specify my own, but see the patch for details.
After spending some time today converting your script to simply a s
script executed by a shell script for each file and then trying to
compile the results I've noticed there are many dependencies on
java.io.x where x has to do with GetFields, PutFields, and other
serialization related stuff. Based on this I do not think it will be
possible for us to release the collections classes in a way which is
meaningful to other users of Sun's 1.1.8 work. If there is a reason
to finish this so it can be used on another 1.2 VM/class library other
than Classpath let me know.
Thanks for all the work Jochen and I'm sorry this took me so long to
get to.
--
Brian Jones <address@hidden>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Collection classes as separate package for java 1.1,
Brian Jones <=