[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem in Class.java
From: |
John Leuner |
Subject: |
Re: Problem in Class.java |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Apr 2001 19:13:40 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.15i |
> > > This is not even compiled but It Should Work (TM).
> >
> > I don't mean to criticise, but writing code without compiling it
> > is extremely error prone.
> >
>
> Sure is. That's why I sent it here instead of checking it in :) I didn't
> have a copy of Classpath handy and I don't feel right spending more than a
> few minutes on it at work.
I understand.
> The problem my patch had, though, wouldn't have been caught by the compiler.
> It was a good deal more insidious.
I suppose I mean compiling and running ... but somehow I still think that the
notion of compiling and running the code (in the next few minutes) makes me
spend more time thinking about what I'm writing, maybe subconciously I also
know that it will save time if I fix any problems now and not later.
Hmm, the psychology of programming.
> I believe so.
>
> The patch looks good (much better than my attempt); the only thing I would
> do is put the '[' and 'L' case into the switch ... it's slightly more
> efficient that way, less function calls and such.
Right.
> I'll try and get a cvs tree down tomorrow.
Thanks
John Leuner
--
- Re: Problem in Class.java, (continued)
- RE: Problem in Class.java, John Keiser, 2001/04/26
- Re: Problem in Class.java,
John Leuner <=