classpath
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: address@hidden: Re: [Jikesrvm-researchers] Congratulations on Jikes-


From: Yann SECQ
Subject: Re: address@hidden: Re: [Jikesrvm-researchers] Congratulations on Jikes-RVM 2.0 - questions about licensing.]
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:57:46 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011023

Kevin A. Burton wrote:

I took a look at the directory listings in the jar.  It looks like they only
have the basics of a 1.1 style VM.  AKA only the basic stuff.
It would be at least nice to compare and contrast between the different
implementations to see if there is anythign we can bring over.  Of course if it
isn't Free Software there is nothing we can do.

It's always the same question : what do you mean by free software ?
I think it is not copyleft, but it is an approved OpenSource license.

yann.

--
 / Yann SECQ            Equipe SMAC           address@hidden \
| Multi-Agent Systems Modeling & Agent Oriented Programming |
 \ http://www.lifl.fr/SMAC        http://www.lifl.fr/~secq /




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]