[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compiling with jikes > 1.13
From: |
John Leuner |
Subject: |
Re: Compiling with jikes > 1.13 |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Feb 2002 18:37:52 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.23i |
> > Hi,
> >
> > The HACKING file says:
> > - IBM jikes 1.13 (newer versions up to 1.15 appear to be broken)
> >
> > I am using jikes Version 1.15 - 26 Sept 2001 and didn't notice any
> > errors. Does anybody remember why we don't recommend jikes > 1.13?
>
> With Wonka we've had problems with every version after 1.12.1 (!).
> "Problems" includes: dumps core on valid input, outputs illegal bytecode
>
> (pushes & pops do not balance) ... if you need more detail I can try to
> give it, but it will require a little work (download, compile, try to
> run, ...)
There were issues (don't remember exactly what), but I've been using the jikes
1.15 in debian/unstable and it seems to work fine. (I have compiled all of
classpath with it)
John Leuner
- Compiling with jikes > 1.13, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/04
- Re: Compiling with jikes > 1.13, Chris Gray, 2002/02/04
- Re: Compiling with jikes > 1.13,
John Leuner <=
- Re: Compiling with jikes > 1.13, Stuart Ballard, 2002/02/04
- Re: Compiling with jikes > 1.13, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2002/02/04
- Re: Compiling with jikes > 1.13, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/04
- Re: Compiling with jikes > 1.13, Eric Blake, 2002/02/04
- Re: Compiling with jikes > 1.13, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/05
- Re: Compiling with jikes > 1.13, Tom Tromey, 2002/02/05
- Re: Compiling with jikes > 1.13, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/06
- Re: Compiling with jikes > 1.13, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/06
- Re: Compiling with jikes > 1.13, Mark Wielaard, 2002/02/06
- Re: Compiling with jikes > 1.13, Tom Tromey, 2002/02/06