[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Kissme-general] Re: First Try Debug.
From: |
Stephen Crawley |
Subject: |
Re: [Kissme-general] Re: First Try Debug. |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Jun 2002 09:55:13 +1000 |
Alex,
> After looking into the debug code from vm .... it look like the problem
> may be existing around the zip loading code... Not 100% sure yet.. but
> when I swap the bootpath sequence
> e.g kissme:classpath will have different error then classpath:kissme.
You MUST put kissme/classes.zip BEFORE classpath/glibj.zip on the
classpath. The former contains the kissme specific implementations
of key low-level classes that must be loaded in preference to the
'reference' implementations in the latter.
[Note to self: this should be documented somewhere.]
> Question1
> -bootclasspath should be included kissme/classes.zip and
> classpath/glibj.zip
> correct?
Strictly yes. In practice, if you put them on the regular classpath
(in the correct order -- see above), you get the same effect.
[We know that this is wrong. Classes on the boot classpath should be
loaded differently to those on the regular classpath. We'll get there
eventually.]
-- Steve