[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: I wish to help
From: |
Andy Walter |
Subject: |
Re: I wish to help |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:32:01 +0200 |
Hi,
On Thursday 31 October 2002 12:15, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> Has someone actually tried Rudolph with GNU Classpath?
Yes, it is running quite well here. But we replaced many native methods (all
but 5) by Java code. Since Rudolph uses a proprietary interface, this
replacement might be interesting for classpath. On the downside, our
implementation diverged from Rudolph.
> Also take into account that Wonka contains only the java.awt,
> java.awt.event and java.awt.image packages. We have that and
> java.awt.color, java.awt.datatransfer, java.awt.dnd, java.awt.dnd.peer,
> java.awt.font, java.awt.geom, java.awt.im, java.awt.im.spi,
> java.awt.image.renderable, java.awt.peer and java.awt.print. The
> important advantage that Rudolph has is of course that the code that
> they have actually works!
Not only that but it also doesn't depend on GTK. I think it would be great to
separate the top level graphics stuff from the low level peer classes by a
common, well-defined interface. That way had three sets of peer classes
(GTK-based, acunia framebuffer, jni framebuffer), but only one common set of
top level classes, which are probably much more (I have to admit that
personally, I don't have to do much with graphics).
I expect that the sooner we agree on such a common layer, the fewer redundant
work there is on the top level.
> And please make sure that all arrangements between Acunia and the FSF
> are made clear and public. The last deal that was done with respect to
> the AWT code (with Transvirtual) was never communicated clearly and that
> produced some tensions. (I am perfectly happy to let RMS try to get a
> deal that is in the best interest of all free software users as long as
> it is clear in the end what has been decided.)
RMS for sure is the right person to do this. I had expected all agreements of
the FSF to be made public and am surprised to read this wasn't the case with
Transvirtual.
Cheers,
Andy.
--
aicas GmbH * Hoepfner Burg /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
Haid-und-Neu-Straße 18 * 76131 Karlsruhe \ / No HTML or RTF in mail
http://www.aicas.com X No MS-Word in mail
Tel: +49-721-663 968-24; Fax: +49-721-663 968-94 / \ Respect Open Standards