Re: Proposal for changes to Classpath's JNI libraries

[Brian Jones]

Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:

> The Classpath jni.h was derived from the libgcj jni.h.  I don't know
> what process was used to do it though.  I think the two files ought to
> be completely merged.  For one thing the libgcj jni.h has had bug
> fixes, and is compatible with the 1.4 specification.
> 
> Brian, according to the ChangeLog you did it, with some fixes from
> other places.  Can you describe these to me?  Was it just the
> DefineClass fix?  I'm willing to add the numbered comments to the
> libgcj jni.h change it to use jni_md.h if you do that (i.e., I'll
> complete the merge).  Also, why is it `jni.h.in'?  I don't see any
> @...@ substitutions in it.

Tom, I compared the files in all 3 places: Japhar, SableVM, GCJ.
Differences resolved by looking at the specification.  

It's only so that configure copy it to the $builddir along with
appropriate machine specific file.

Brian
-- 
Brian Jones <address@hidden>
http://www.haphazard.org/~cbj/