RE: NYIException

[Jeroen Frijters]

[I'm resending this, apologies if you get it twice]

Andrew Haley wrote:
> My only argument was against subclassing Error, because the Java
> specification strongly implies that the only reasonable thing to do
> when receiving an Error is issue a disgnostic and die.

I apologize for the confusion. 

> In the case of
> unimplemented Classpath methods, this seems rather extreme.

Why? I don't see how you can reasonably continue given that an arbitrary
functionality that the application depends on is missing.

Regards,
Jeroen