[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
OT: Licensing Java code (was Tests)
From: |
Thomas |
Subject: |
OT: Licensing Java code (was Tests) |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:34:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 28 March 2004 18:41, you wrote:
> > Is the Apache licence considered Free for you guys (I'm really an open
> > source programmer, not a free-software one..).
>
> Yes, it certainly is a Free Software license.
> But it is currently not compatible with the GPL.
> ... we don't really recommend
> releasing and/or combining larger works under the Apache license.
For my puposes the GPL is too viral. Java is quickly becoming the choice of
big companies for their apps; and GPL is almost never a correct licence for
code from companies. LGPL would be, if it would be fixed by the FSF to be
'compatible' with Java..
> So creating a derived larger work of some GPLed and Apache licensed code
> is not distributable (since there are some restrictions with respect to
> patent licensing that are not allowed by the GPL).
I should have been more correct in my wording; I use the Apache licence
version 1; I refuse to use version 2. Version 1 does not discuss patent
licensing.
- --
Regards
Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAaTEoCojCW6H2z/QRAjlSAKDiLnyri5uKzW24kqI6d5vSZJt6gQCfbUbT
83+ymZFdOHLjf8NYdJKyO04=
=KnJy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----