Re: Patch: remove C++ keywords

[Eric Blake]

Tom Tromey wrote:

> My only comment or criticism is that, in the absence of regular
> checking for this, we'll just see more code like it checked in.
> That's been the experience with non-C89 constructs, I don't see why
> this would be any different.  It's just too hard to remember to write
> in some language subset without compiler-assisted checking.

To avoid regressions, would we want to use a common header file to #define the 
C++ keywords into something that will generate a compile-time error when 
compiling under C?  That is

#define this do not use C++ keywords, JNI must compile in C and C++

--
Someday, I might put a cute statement here.

Eric Blake             address@hidden