[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: JDK 1.5 support?
From: |
Andrew John Hughes |
Subject: |
Re: JDK 1.5 support? |
Date: |
Sat, 03 Jul 2004 00:56:37 +0100 |
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 13:51, Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Andrew John Hughes wrote:
>
> > Has anyone run the JDK 1.5 beta against Classpath using japitools? I
> > know its not production but it may be interesting to see what the
> > differences are. The licensing is different on the beta, so I'm wary
> > about trying this myself.
>
> I doubt japitools would swallow it, as the class file format has changed
> in 1.5 :) But the underlying tols (JADE, afaik) might have been updated
> to deal with 1.5-ish classes, so you *may* be able to puzzle together a
> version of japitools that can deal with 1.5.
>
> cheers,
> dalibor topic
I sort of guessed along those lines as I wrote this ;-)
Once 1.5 becomes stable, I may have a look into this. Sun's licensing
for betas states that only experimental use is allowed, and I don't want
to cause any problems with this (the license differs between betas and
release).
--
Andrew :-)
Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history.
`Don't bother us with politics' respond those who don't want to learn.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- RE: JDK 1.5 support?, David Holmes, 2004/07/01
- RE: JDK 1.5 support?, Andrew John Hughes, 2004/07/01
- Re: JDK 1.5 support?, Robert Schuster, 2004/07/01
- RE: JDK 1.5 support?, David Holmes, 2004/07/01
- RE: JDK 1.5 support?, Andrew John Hughes, 2004/07/01
- RE: JDK 1.5 support?, David Holmes, 2004/07/01
- RE: JDK 1.5 support?, Andrew John Hughes, 2004/07/01
- Re: JDK 1.5 support?, Dalibor Topic, 2004/07/02
- Re: JDK 1.5 support?,
Andrew John Hughes <=
- Re: JDK 1.5 support?, Dalibor Topic, 2004/07/03
Re: JDK 1.5 support?, Bryce McKinlay, 2004/07/02