classpath
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[FW] Re: which jvm for gnujaxp?


From: Arnaud Vandyck
Subject: [FW] Re: which jvm for gnujaxp?
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:39:18 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)

Hi all,

I had a problem running gnujaxp transformation with sablevm, jamvm (but
I don't know their mailing list) and gij. I did succeed with kaffe.

Chris investigate a little more and it seems the problem is when native
code is called (libxml or libxsl).

Here is an example.

NOTE: I post this mail on several mailing lists but only reply on your
      own one, thanks.

--- Begin Message --- Subject: Re: which jvm for gnujaxp? Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 18:52:51 +0100
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
Can I forward this mail to the gcj dev mailing list?

Sure. I attach a simple test case which uses the libxmlj SAX parser to parse an XML file given on argv. Using java=gij, I get the following:

# ./saxtest test.xml
>> Parsing test.xml
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: parseStream
   <<No stacktrace available>>
Exception in thread "Thread-1" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: freeLibxsltGlobal
   <<No stacktrace available>>

# gij --version
gij (GNU libgcj) version 3.4.2

Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

# uname -a
Darwin bobtail.local 7.5.0 Darwin Kernel Version 7.5.0: Thu Aug 5 19:26:16 PDT2004; root:xnu/xnu-517.7.21.obj~3/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc

Using the Apple-supplied java, the program behaves as expected.
--
Chris Burdess

Attachment: saxtest.java
Description: Text document

Attachment: saxtest
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---

-- 
Arnaud Vandyck
http://fosdem.org/
Free and Open Source Developers' European Meeting
February 26-27 2005,
Bruxelles, Belgium

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]