Re: jamvm 1.2.5

[Robert Lougher]

Sorry, that should be PREFETCH and USE_CACHE should not be defined on
Intel.  Got to rush to get the train to London..

Rob.

On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:30:21 +0000, Robert Lougher
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> Unfortunately, it looks like I've screwed up the configure script.
> Works fine on ppc, but not on intel, selecting the wrong interpreter
> variant (PREFETCH and DIRECT should not be defined).  Here it is
> anyway.  I'll fix it on the Eurostar :)
> 
> Rob.
> 
> 
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:22:28 +0100, Michael Koch <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 02:07:47PM +0000, Robert Lougher wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I also wanted to do a new release before Fosdem.  It's all ready to
> > > put up on sourceforge apart from the stupid firewall in work.  As I'm
> > > off to Fosdem myself later, it won't be up until Monday evening at the
> > > earliest.  However, for anybody who wants it, I can send it to you for
> > > the next couple of hours, or if you're going to Fosdem, come and find
> > > me.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Rob.
> > >
> > > P.S. Highlight of 1.2.5 is a new interpreter, which consistently gives
> > > a 2x performance improvement (on Athlon and PowerPC).
> >
> > Unfortunatly I will not come to FOSDEM. Can you please mail me the
> > tarball ? Then I can test it andd create debs. I'm really looking
> > forward a 10 times faster jamvm then kaffe (currently its 5 times faster
> > from a special testcase I have, kaffe dont supports JIT yet on PPC).
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Classpath mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
> >
> 
> 
>