[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Implementation details of VMStackWalker

From: Jeroen Frijters
Subject: RE: Implementation details of VMStackWalker
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 11:24:37 +0200

Andrew Haley wrote:
> Which is the Right Answer: the caller of baz *is* Frob.

It *may* be the right answer, but how can you be certain that the coder of 
class Foo intended this? IMNSHO, code like this is completely unauditable 
(remember, this isn't just a correctness issue, access to class loaders is a 
potential security issue).


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]