Re: classpath bugzilla question

[Mark Wielaard]

Hi,

On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 11:33 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I notice that the classpath bugzilla doesn't have target milestones.
> And, the 'reported against' field doesn't list current cvs in any way.
> 
> I would like to suggest that we always list the next release in both
> the 'reported against' and 'target milestone' fields, e.g. right now
> both of these fields (among their other choices) would show 0.18.
> 
> For reporting, this means folks can more accurately indicate what
> version they are using.
> 
> For target milestone, I think we should do what gcc does, and set this
> field when we close the PR.  That way we can later easily run a query
> to see what bugs were fixed in a given release.

Good idea. I added 0.18 as target milestone (the only one for this
moment, will update after the release). And changed the CVS version
number to 0.18-pre (was 0.17+cvs).

2005-08-24  Mark Wielaard  <address@hidden>

        * configure.ac: Set version to 0.18-pre.

Cheers,

Mark

--- configure.ac        24 Aug 2005 08:36:39 -0000      1.102
+++ configure.ac        24 Aug 2005 22:22:57 -0000
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 dnl define([AC_CACHE_LOAD], )dnl
 dnl define([AC_CACHE_SAVE], )dnl

-AC_INIT([GNU Classpath],[0.17+cvs],address@hidden,[classpath])
+AC_INIT([GNU Classpath],[0.18-pre],address@hidden,[classpath])
 AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR(java/lang/System.java)

 AC_CANONICAL_TARGET

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part