Re: [Devjam] Re: ANN: gjdoc 0.7.6 released

[Michael Koch]

On Do, Okt 20, 2005 at 09:06:55 +0200, Julian Scheid wrote:
> David Gilbert wrote:
> >One question - what's left to do before a 1.0.0 release?  I think it's 
> >ready now...
> 
> I just got a bug report about an NPE and, while fixing it, noticed that
> the documentation for abstract methods didn't include the abstract
> keyword (!)
> 
> With bugs like that still cropping up, I'd rather keep the 0.x tag for
> now...
> 
> I agree that a major release should be aimed for in the next couple of
> weeks, especially because I'm planning a major rewrite of the gjdoc
> core.  But the last thing I want is to have some annoying bug in the
> first major release ever.  After literally years of on-and-off hacking
> on gjdoc, I don't see a need to hurry.
> 
> Anyway, thanks for your encouraging words and let's see how well the
> fixed 0.7.6 release works for people.  If no other major bugs are
> reported against 0.7.6, I'll consider naming the next release 1.0-pre1.

I know version numbers like 1.0-pre1 are pretty common. But still uply
for automated version comparison. Please use some thing like 0.99.1,
0.99.2, etc.


Cheers,
Michael
-- 
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html

Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/