classpathx-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Classpathx-discuss] Re: servlet code


From: Tom Tromey
Subject: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: servlet code
Date: 15 Jun 2001 16:23:30 -0600

>>>>> "Per" == Per Bothner <address@hidden> writes:

Per> However, having the extensions packages separate means having to
Per> resolve the library search rules.  I.e. does the programmer need
Per> to specify explicit CLASSPATH (when compiling) or -l (when
Per> linking) to get the extension library?  This is a somewhat
Per> controversial issue.

What is the controversy again?

I think when searching for .class files we ought to follow whatever
javac does.  javac compatibility is a longstanding goal, and I think
it is a reasonable one.

Tom



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]