[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation

From: David Brownell
Subject: Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Activation implementation
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 14:50:09 -0800

> > It looks like activation will require some major plumbing.   At one point, a
> > number of support classes were sucked up and incorporated directly into
> > the javax.activation files making the files much more difficult to read and
> > maintain.
> Sorry, what support classes?

I couldn't figure that out either.  The "hard to read" bits were the two-space
indents ... better than one or three (yeech!) but not as good as four or eight
(which don't hide structure as thoroughly).  Even so, lines exceed 80 chars ...
Some of that javadoc needs work too.  Plus, some of those files have an
issue with the "if" and its consequence being at the same indent level.

Is that stuff going to get relicensed as "GPL plus library exception"?  It
seems to be LGPL now, precluding static linking and going against the
policy I thought we'd agreed on.

- Dave

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]