[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnuj
|
From: |
Arnaud Vandyck |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp? |
|
Date: |
Sun, 13 Apr 2003 20:10:18 +0200 (CEST) |
Nic Ferrier <address@hidden> wrote:
> GNUJAXP could be a native library, if GCJ compiles it to one. Many
> of us are actively pursuing the use of java as a natively compiled
> language. That's why GNU java projects should support native builds
> "out of the box".
The ease of Java with the speed of native code?! ouch! I catch it and
will switch to autoconf-automake-make thing :-)
-- arnaud @ home
pgpUFVQ5rsPXj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?, Arnaud Vandyck, 2003/04/12
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?, Dalibor Topic, 2003/04/13
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?, Nic Ferrier, 2003/04/13
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?, Dalibor Topic, 2003/04/13
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?, Nic Ferrier, 2003/04/13
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?, Nic Ferrier, 2003/04/13
- gnujaxp build system (was: Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?), Arnaud Vandyck, 2003/04/13
- Re: gnujaxp build system (was: Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?), Dalibor Topic, 2003/04/13
- [Classpathx-discuss] Re: gnujaxp build system, Arnaud Vandyck, 2003/04/13
- Re: gnujaxp build system (was: Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?), Nic Ferrier, 2003/04/13
- Re: gnujaxp build system (was: Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Fw: [Classpathx-xml] What is the status of gnujaxp?), Brian Jones, 2003/04/13