[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Classpathx-discuss] Re: classpathx audit
From: |
Arnaud Vandyck |
Subject: |
[Classpathx-discuss] Re: classpathx audit |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Apr 2004 10:12:03 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Mark Wielaard <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 2004-03-06 at 20:20, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
>> Mark Wielaard <address@hidden> told me to report about our project and
>> the compromise:
>>
>> classpathx is clean!
>>
>> I have an old CVS repository on my machine and when I did a cvs update,
>> noticed no differences between my local repository and the Savannah one.
>
> Just to make sure that I didn't misunderstand.
> Did you follow the text about the before/after compromise comparison at
> http://savannah.gnu.org/statements/changesets-available.txt.asc
> And is the changeset for classpathx mentioned in the text above
> (ftp://ftp.gnu.org/savannah/changsets/classpathx-changes.tar.gz)
> precisely the same as the differences you noted between your local
> version and the Savannah one?
After reading all the diff's, I can say that everything is OK for
classpathx/jaxp. I'll make some more investigation in other sub-projects
later.
Regards,
- --
Arnaud
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAcmZV4vzFZu62tMIRAuTNAJ9pRO3sWR1W3ulgI/AtNchzHbje4QCfYzP8
cpXxXUSOJvOuwaptEciyc2w=
=dL/o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Classpathx-discuss] Re: classpathx audit,
Arnaud Vandyck <=