[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re:

From: Andrew John Hughes
Subject: Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re:
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:48:30 +0000

On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 09:58, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 15. Januar 2005 18:59 schrieb Chris Burdess:
> > 
> >>Ewout Prangsma wrote:
> >>
> >>>Are there any plans or activities to include the
> >>>api in classpath?
> >>
> >>This API would normally be developed under the auspices of the
> >>classpathx project. Nobody has got around to writing it yet, are
> >>you interested?
> > 
> > 
> > There are several free implementations out there already:
> > MX4J, XMOJO etc.
> > 
> The last release of MX4J (2.1.0) came with a few problems.  We are 
> desperately needing people to help looking into fixing them.  That would 
> be much more productive than writting another JMX from scratch.
> Regards to all,
> Fernando
> _______________________________________________
> Classpath mailing list
> address@hidden

MX4J uses the Apache Software License, which, IIRC,  is incompatible
with the Classpath license.
Andrew :-)

Please avoid sending me Microsoft Office (e.g. Word, PowerPoint) attachments.

No software patents in Europe --

"Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history.
`Don't bother us with politics' respond those who don't want to learn."
-- Richard Stallman

"We've all been part of the biggest beta test the world has ever known --
-- Victor Wheatman, Gartner

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]