classpathx-xml
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Classpathx-xml] Aelfred2 and JDK1.1 compatibility


From: Musachy Barroso
Subject: Re: [Classpathx-xml] Aelfred2 and JDK1.1 compatibility
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 16:32:24 -0400

when I finish with the failing sax tests (we have a 94%) I'll spend
sometime replacing the objects arrays by collection of objects (we
already did this for attributes in SAXDriver)

musachy

On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 15:48:13 +0100, Chris Burdess <address@hidden> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Maarten Coene wrote:
> > I was browsing through the sources of SAXDriver and XmlParser, and I
> > noticed a comment in the import statements claiming JDK 1.1
> > compatibility:
> >
> > SAXDriver.java:
> > [...]
> > // maintaining 1.1 compatibility for now ... more portable, PJava, etc
> > // Iterator, Hashmap and ArrayList ought to be faster
> > import java.util.ArrayList;
> > import java.util.Collections;
> > import java.util.Enumeration;
> > import java.util.Hashtable;
> > import java.util.Iterator;
> > import java.util.List;
> > import java.util.Vector;
> > [...]
> >
> > However, some of these imports are not 1.1 compatible ... should the
> > comment be removed, or should the code be refactored to keep 1.1
> > compatibility?
> 
> JDK1.1 compatibility is not a target, unlike Classpath/libgcj
> compatibility.
> 
> We should be reevaluating this code to use more performant collection
> classes.
> - --
> Chris Burdess
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
> 
> iD8DBQFBFj0t6dl1DEqHgrgRAtyBAJ0eBJnJkhZbzV7lazN2mep3QrzNmwCeJNND
> hhcqowKT4sWtiiG9p6Bvc8A=
> =QIoZ
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Classpathx-xml mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpathx-xml
> 


-- 
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?"
                                                         Pink Floyd




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]