[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Classpathx-xml] (Fwd) Re: [gnu.org #213276] Licence compatibility for J
From: |
Phil Shaw |
Subject: |
[Classpathx-xml] (Fwd) Re: [gnu.org #213276] Licence compatibility for James Cl |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:45:00 +0100 |
This response from the licencing team didn't get through the mailing
list filter. Just for information.
------- Forwarded message follows -------
Subject: Re: [gnu.org #213276] Licence compatibility for James
Clark's XT
From: "address@hidden via RT" <address@hidden>
Send reply to: address@hidden
To: address@hidden
Copies to: address@hidden
Date sent: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:45:51 -0400
This is a Free Software license, compatible with the GPL.
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 12:19, address@hidden via RT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working on a project that may need a Java XSL processor some way
> down the line. We intend to release the project under GPL and I'm
> doing research on what's available to work with.
>
> I have been in touch with the GNU ClasspathX mailing list and it was
> suggested I ask you about the status of James Clark's XT, now
> maintained by Bill Lindsey.
>
> http://www.blnz.com/xt/xt-20020426a-src/index.html
>
> See the two links near the top of the page.
>
> To me, the permission seems open and free, but I would appreciate a
> more authoritative opinion.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Phil
--
-Dave Turner
GPL Compliance Engineer
Support my work: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=novalis&p=FSF
------- End of forwarded message -------
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Classpathx-xml] (Fwd) Re: [gnu.org #213276] Licence compatibility for James Cl,
Phil Shaw <=