[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Classpathx-xml] (Fwd) Re: [ #213276] Licence compatibility for J

From: Phil Shaw
Subject: [Classpathx-xml] (Fwd) Re: [ #213276] Licence compatibility for James Cl
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 08:45:00 +0100

This response from the licencing team didn't get through the mailing 
list filter. Just for information.

------- Forwarded message follows -------
Subject:                Re: [ #213276] Licence compatibility for James 
Clark's XT
From:                   "address@hidden via RT" <address@hidden>
Send reply to:          address@hidden
To:                     address@hidden
Copies to:              address@hidden
Date sent:              Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:45:51 -0400

This is a Free Software license, compatible with the GPL.

On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 12:19, address@hidden via RT wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm working on a project that may need a Java XSL processor some way
> down the line. We intend to release the project under GPL and I'm
> doing research on what's available to work with.
> I have been in touch with the GNU ClasspathX mailing list and it was
> suggested I ask you about the status of James Clark's XT, now
> maintained by Bill Lindsey.
> See the two links near the top of the page.
> To me, the permission seems open and free, but I would appreciate a
> more authoritative opinion.
> Best regards,
> Phil
-Dave Turner
GPL Compliance Engineer
Support my work:

------- End of forwarded message -------

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]