[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: Fixlet for bug #8860 - check for null lock object
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
Re: FYI: Fixlet for bug #8860 - check for null lock object |
Date: |
Tue, 18 May 2004 00:05:49 +0200 |
Hi,
On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 09:23, Michael Koch wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 16. Mai 2004 11:30 schrieb Mark Wielaard:
> > - * sections
> > + * sections. Must be not be null.
>
> Shouldnt this be "Must not be null." I'm neither a native english
> speaker nor very good in english ...
Yes. Thanks for spotting that.
Fixed as follows:
2004-05-17 Mark Wielaard <address@hidden>
* java/io/Writer.java (Writer(Object)): Fixed API doc.
Cheers,
Mark
--- java/io/Writer.java 16 May 2004 09:31:25 -0000 1.12
+++ java/io/Writer.java 17 May 2004 22:05:28 -0000
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
* on the specified <code>Object</code>.
*
* @param lock The <code>Object</code> to use for synchronizing critical
- * sections. Must be not be null.
+ * sections. Must not be null.
*/
protected Writer(Object lock)
{
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part