Re: audit of Windows triplets

[Ben Elliston]

On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 08:36:13AM -0400, Earnie wrote:

> > I am thinking of removing the following cases:
> > 
> >    Alpha\ *:Windows_NT*:*)
> >    21064:Windows_NT:50:3)
> >    [345]86:Windows_95:*|[345]86:Windows_98:*|[345]86:Windows_NT:*)
> >    i*:windows32*:*)
> >    i*:Windows_NT*:*|Pentium*:Windows_NT*:*)
> >    p*:CYGWIN*:*)                                    (matched PPC)
> >    *:Interix*:*)
> > 
> > Thoughts?
> 
> As far as MinGW is concerned I have no problems with removing these.
> You didn't list 8664:Windows_NT:*), I'm okay with that one too.

Thanks. I'm not normally inclined to remove triplets (because I find
it a useful way to preserve the history!) but in this case, it's too
confusing for all of these defunct attempts to do Unix on Windows.

Cheers,
Ben

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature