[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [address@hidden: Re: thumbv7[arm] support]
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: [address@hidden: Re: thumbv7[arm] support] |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Dec 2020 16:40:08 -0700 |
Hi Dmitry,
> + | arm | arm[bl]e | arme[lb] | armv[2-8] | armv[3-8][lb] | armv7[arm] |
thumbv7[arm] \
thumbv7[arm] means thumbv7a | thumbv7r | thumbv7m - did you mean that?
Yes, evidently that is what is needed, from his response that I
forwarded on Nov 21. I'll include it below again.
Just to make sure you didn't mean that thumbv7* needs to be translated
to arm or armv7*.
Evidently not.
What's the CPU-MFR-OPSYS triplet you are using?
I don't know. M. Kolanich? --thanks, karl.
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 13:59:59 +0300
From: KOLANICH <kolan_n@mail.ru>
As I understand, thumbv7 is just armv7, but using thumb-2
instructions. I have googled the variants, thumbv7r and thumbv7m are
also found in the Net, and I have personally tested thumbv7a, programs
compiled (with stock clang-12 + Google NDK) with it are built and run on
targets very fine.
- Re: [address@hidden: Re: thumbv7[arm] support],
Karl Berry <=