cons-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Dependency flaw in cons (and scons) ?


From: Brad Garcia
Subject: Re: Dependency flaw in cons (and scons) ?
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:36:35 -0500 (EST)

On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Johan Holmberg wrote:

> You should note that the command lines included in the signature
> calculations are *before* expansion of %< and %>.
...
> Were you aware of that ?

No, I was not!  Thanks!

I guess the inputs are included in the signature calculation through other
means, so not expanding %<, %1, %2, etc. is not an issue.

But this makes it even more imperative that the output file name
becomes part of the build signature.


Brad Garcia





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]