[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] tests: avoid sort-spinlock-abuse false positive under heavy
|
From: |
James Youngman |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] tests: avoid sort-spinlock-abuse false positive under heavy load |
|
Date: |
Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:40:10 +0100 |
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
> +# This isn't terribly expensive, but it must not be run under heavy load.
> +# Since the "very expensive" are already run only with -j1, adding this
"very expensive" tests
> +# test to the list ensures it still gets _some_ (albeit minimal) coverage
> +# while not causing false-positive failures in day to day runs.
> +very_expensive_