[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: vs "Bug#DDDDD" in logs

From: Mike Frysinger
Subject: Re: vs "Bug#DDDDD" in logs
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 17:55:29 -0500
User-agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; )

On Tuesday 15 November 2011 16:48:38 Jim Meyering wrote:
> I've noticed a few references in recent commit logs like this:
>   See additional discussion in Bug#9939.
> My preference has been to use the slightly more verbose
>, on the principle that that will
> be more accessible to most people.  I.e., you can probably
> just click on it, or mouse-then-click.  While for the "Bug#...."
> form, one would have to know the URL prefix.
> Preferences to the contrary?

i think the trade off is to use a git tag like:
        X-Coreutils-Bug: DDDDD

in my own projects, i tend to use "#DDDDD" in the logs and then supplement 
with URL: tags.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]