Re: Splitting search results from a "find -print0"

[Pádraig Brady]

On 08/01/15 08:25, Markus Elfring wrote:
>>> Let's just go with -t CHAR for now.
>>
>> attached an updated patch, with more tests, and documentation.
> 
> Thanks for your concrete update suggestion.
> 
> I would like to clarify a few more implementation details
> of your improvement.
> * Will it also influence the functionality around the parameter 
> "--number=chunks"?

Should work the same.

> * How will the involved text line counting be affected by the configurable
>   record set delimiter?

Ditto.  We'll probably go with the --separator option rather than 
--line-separator
to avoid ambiguities like that.  We'll adjust the docs for --lines, 
--line-bytes,
and --number, with something like s|lines|lines/records|.

thanks,
Pádraig.