coreutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Question re: GNU coreutils for Windows


From: Bernhard Voelker
Subject: Re: Question re: GNU coreutils for Windows
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:40:43 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0

On 03/25/2015 03:14 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
-mno-cygwin is obsolete (it was an old way to attempt to build a mingw
binary without using a cross-compiler); these days, cygwin ships with a
proper cross-compiler for directly building mingw apps.  But yes, it is
possible to build pure mingw apps using the cygwin environment; and in
fact, the MSYS project ships such binaries.  But it all boils down to
what you want - if you want an entire ecosystem of ported applications,
use cygwin (all pre-compiled, but those binaries all depend on
cygwin1.dll);

I don't think using non-statically linked binaries is a good idea,
because of the dependency to that cygwin1.dll: if there's any other
such binary on the system which depends on another version of that DLL,
then your program won't start: AFAIR there can only be one cygwin1.dll
loaded at a time.

if you want native applications statically linked, use
mingw binaries (easiest when using the pre-compiled binaries from the
MSYS distribution, but fewer applications available).

Do you mean the ones from here?
  http://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/files/MSYS/Base/coreutils/
There's 5.93 only ... and they depend on 'msys-1.0.dll'.

AFAIK the best bet on Windows - when you want/have to avoid a complete
cygwin environment because you only need a few utils like md5sum.exe
- is still: http://unxutils.sourceforge.net/

Have a nice day,
Berny




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]