[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug#801654: dircolors: Please support colors on TERM=screen.xterm-25
|
From: |
Bob Proulx |
|
Subject: |
Re: Bug#801654: dircolors: Please support colors on TERM=screen.xterm-256color |
|
Date: |
Thu, 15 Oct 2015 13:34:59 -0600 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Pádraig Brady wrote:
> > -TERM con132x25
> > -TERM con132x30
> > -TERM con132x43
> > -TERM con132x60
> > -TERM con80x25
> > -TERM con80x28
> > -TERM con80x30
> > -TERM con80x43
> > -TERM con80x50
> > -TERM con80x60
> > +TERM con[0-9]*x[0-9]*
>
> Going to tighten that to:
>
> +TERM con80x??
> +TERM con132x??
I don't know. But selecting just 80 and 132 width terminals
specifically doesn't feel as good as the originally suggested wildcard
matching any size of terminal. It doesn't feel right.
Is there a reason you are not wanting to make it a generic size?
> I've not heard any objections about this,
> so will apply later.
I think the original wildcard is fine.
Bob