[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [rm] Order of parameters

From: Piotr Piecia
Subject: Re: [rm] Order of parameters
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 09:14:31 +0100

2015-12-01 4:34 GMT+01:00 Eric Blake <address@hidden>:
> Yes, it is intentional that whichever is last between -i and -f wins;
> the two options are mutually exclusive, but do not cause a warning (so
> that you can have an alias that does 'rm -i' by default but still issue
> -f to your alias).
Ok, thanks for explanation.

Best regards dracorp

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]