[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rm] Order of parameters
|
From: |
Piotr Piecia |
|
Subject: |
Re: [rm] Order of parameters |
|
Date: |
Tue, 1 Dec 2015 09:14:31 +0100 |
2015-12-01 4:34 GMT+01:00 Eric Blake <address@hidden>:
> Yes, it is intentional that whichever is last between -i and -f wins;
> the two options are mutually exclusive, but do not cause a warning (so
> that you can have an alias that does 'rm -i' by default but still issue
> -f to your alias).
Ok, thanks for explanation.
--
Best regards dracorp
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [rm] Order of parameters,
Piotr Piecia <=