[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: makedb or mdb?
From: |
Andrew Gaylard |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: makedb or mdb? |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Dec 2005 22:13:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051101 |
R. Bernstein wrote:
>So far, the test release of ddd with GNU make debugging seems okay.
>
>(Okay - there just the vast silence. But I'll take no news as good
>news.)
>
>One of the things though I'm thinking of changing is the debugger name
>from makedb to mdb. I'm afraid makedb will get confused with the Unix
>command to make a DBM file. I did a google search on mdb and that
>seems is free. mdb seems to fit better into the scheme of debuggers
>such as gdb, adb, jdb, pdb, xdb debuggers.
>
>I'll probably have to be a little bit careful here to time a ddd
>(test) release along with the next remake release.
>
>As always, if folks have thoughts and comments, send them along.
>
>
>
Yup, I concur.
Andrew.
- Re: RFC: makedb or mdb?,
Andrew Gaylard <=