Re: [Denemo-devel] SVN vs CVS (was: templates)

[Jeremiah Benham]

On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 22:16 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 21:34 +0200, N. Gey wrote:
> > I absolutly prefer cvs over svn and would be happy.
> ??? this is a bit cryptic! What would you be happy to change to SVN or
> not? Are there some disadvantages to SVN - I know that CVS does not
> support versioning of directories, which for complex build systems can
> create a problem re-building old versions of software, but I know
> nothing of SVN.

SVN is extremely easy to learn. I would not worry not knowing it. My
problem I am having is finding the docs on Savannah for setting it up. 

Jeremiah


> Richard
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> > -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> > > Datum: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 11:48:32 -0500
> > > Von: Jeremiah Benham <address@hidden>
> > > An: Richard Shann <address@hidden>
> > > CC: address@hidden
> > > Betreff: Re: [Denemo-devel] templates
> > 
> > > My vote is to switch to SVN. I am willing to do the work and educate
> > > myself on this. SVN allows folders to be moved and renamed and things
> > > like that. I don't want to have to rely on anyone else to do that
> > > because more then likely it is going to happen again in the future. We
> > > can keep perhaps keep svn and cvs in sync until we go full svn. I will
> > > do the work on this if you want. I spent too much time researching how
> > > to do this in cvs and the only ways seemed very evasive and would rely
> > > on someone that has shell access to the cvs directory. 
> > > 
> > > Jeremiah
> > > 
> > > On Fri, 2008-04-25 at 17:30 +0100, Richard Shann wrote:
> > > > I've lost track of this thread - shall I do this:
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Well, I see there is already a directory called examples, containing
> > > > > examples of lilypond tweaks. As these can now be put inside Denemo
> > > > > files, it would seem to be a good way to go - replacing the .ly files
> > > > > with corresponding .denemo files.
> > > > > ok?
> > > > > Richard
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > or should we take the proper route, which would be to ask the
> > > > administrators of the CVS to remove the spurious directory
> > > > denemo/templates. (I don't think we can do it ourselves, at any rate I
> > > > would not have the confidence to try). The point being that the
> > > > denemo/templates directory is not properly registered with CVS - it
> > > > doesn't download when no -P (prune) option is given, which it should.
> > > > Or, of course, re-build it, or switch to SVN or other more ambitious
> > > > things...
> > > > Richard
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel