Re: [Denemo-devel] Downloads

[Richard Shann]

On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 11:06 +0200, N. Gey wrote:
> ok. then lets get this on the way.
> But the Download location doesn't matter for the link.
Yes, of course, this occurred to me after I emailed, and I return to
find you have sorted it all out. It is much better to host everything in
one place Savannah and make user-freindly links from denemo.org.

> I suggest that all files can be found in the savannah download section 
> and we link binaries directly.
> 
> Another thing that speaks against hosting downloads on denemo.org (the 
> server) is that all traffic will be on Jeremiahs Server. I don't know 
> what the payments are, but download traffic on private servers is not a 
> good thing.
> 
> 
> Let me repeat it all:
> 
> 1) Binaries for Windows and Mac are linked on denemo.org but hosted on 
> savannah.
> 
> 1b) Do Packages count as bins or source? Does anybody know how the 
> packaging system of major distributions works?
Not specifically, but they don't require that you have a compiler, so
they are (rather do contain) binary images of executable code.

> How can we get denemo to 
> be more uptodate in the packaging-systems?
> 
> 1c) Source Releases, tarballs, are hosted on savannah. (Mainly 
> intersting for linux people) Since there are no plans on real bins
?? the .deb package does contain the executable denemo program.
>  for 
> linux this will be avaible as the "main download".
> 
> 2) git repository stays at it is. I see that the cvs is shut down, well 
> done.
> 
> 
> 
> Richard Shann schrieb:
> > On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 11:36 +0200, N. Gey wrote:
> >   
> >> We are allowed to upload anything to the savannah download area
> >>     
> > Thanks for checking on this.
> >   
> >> https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?106405
> >>
> >>
> >> -------- Original-Nachricht --------
> >>     
> >>> Datum: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 21:35:21 +0200
> >>> Von: "N. Gey" <address@hidden>
> >>> An: address@hidden
> >>> Betreff: [Denemo-devel] Downloads
> >>>       
> >>> The one thing left for releasing (source packages and binaries) the page
> >>> is Denemo itself.
> >>>
> >>> On savannah? On denemo.org? 
> >>>       
> >
> > I would go for putting the sources on savannah and the end-user things
> > (binaries etc, latest only) on denemo.org with friendly looking buttons
> > (penguins and flags etc) to download them, as on the lilypond.org site.
> > Mainly, to avoid clutter, techies will be happie with the directory
> > listings on savannah giving precise details of dates, versions,
> > checksums etc, but others less so.
> >   
> >>> What about the cvs on savannah?
> >>>       
> > This should re-direct to git.
> > Richard
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >
> >   
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel