[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Denemo-devel] Multiple lilypond postfix
From: |
Richard Shann |
Subject: |
Re: [Denemo-devel] Multiple lilypond postfix |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:09:04 +0000 |
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 18:21 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
> syntax that would make us wish we hadn't. But if someone attaches a
> fingering then adds a note then it is very awkward to cope.
> Need to peer at the LilyPond docs I think.
Having peered at the LilyPond docs I think that LilyPond is making a
distinction here which we will have to observe see
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Common-notation-for-fretted-strings#String-number-indications
for example.
I propose to add a field to the chord structure gboolean chordize;
which we can set TRUE as needed, and the exportlilypond will respond by
surrounding the chord with < > even if there is only one note. It will
not be necessary to set chordize if there are more than one note (hence
the name, rather than using a boolean is_chord, which you would then
expect to be set whenever the number of notes is greater than one).
Richard
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Multiple lilypond postfix, Jeremiah Benham, 2009/01/04
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Multiple lilypond postfix, Richard Shann, 2009/01/04
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Multiple lilypond postfix, Richard Shann, 2009/01/07
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Multiple lilypond postfix, Jeremiah Benham, 2009/01/09
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Multiple lilypond postfix, Richard Shann, 2009/01/09
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Multiple lilypond postfix, Richard Shann, 2009/01/09
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Multiple lilypond postfix,
Richard Shann <=
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Multiple lilypond postfix, Richard Shann, 2009/01/09
- Re: [Denemo-devel] Multiple lilypond postfix, Jeremiah Benham, 2009/01/09