Re: [Denemo-devel] The release branch

[Jeremiah Benham]

On Oct 16, 2010, at 12:34 PM, Nils Gey <address@hidden> wrote:

> The fixes are in stable-0.8.20
> Windows-build is ready.
>
> Jeremiah, could you create the release tarball now, please?

When I get home from work.

> Maybe you could tell me what is needed to do that, too?

To create the tarball:
make clean;
./autogen.sh
make dist

Then the FTP instructions:

http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Automated-Upload-Procedure.html

> I notice the tarball has other files and dirs than git.

Which? Maybe they are added by autotools.

Jeremiah



> greetings,
>
> Nils
>
>
> On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:29:49 +0100
> Richard Shann <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > As we have had a showstopper bug to fix, I have taken the  
> > opportunity to
> > fix the spurious includes of lyparserfuncs.h so that the Master  
> > branch
> > should now be good.
> > Aligning the stable-0.8.20 with the master branch will mean reverting
> > the change to src/Makefile.am and merging the changes.
> > Is that ok?
> > Richard
> >
> > On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 08:47 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> > > On Oct 16, 2010, at 3:02 AM, Richard Shann  
> > > <address@hidden>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Jeremiah, Nils
> > > > I see that you had to re-instate lyparserfuncs.h, presumably  
> > > > because I
> > > > forgot to delete includes of it from the various files when I  
> > > > removed
> > > > the old parser.
> > >
> > > Yeah. I added into the tarball. I could not compile the tarball
> > > without including it. If it's supposed to left out I will change  
> > > that
> > > (making sure it compiles) then and remove it from git.
> > >
> > >
> > > > The puzzle then is, how did clean builds work - in
> > > > particular windows gub?
> > >
> > > Pulling from git provides the file. A tarball created with make dist
> > > does not because the file was not mentioned in src/Makefile.am.
> > >
> > > Jeremiah
> > >
> > > > I would like to avoid re-building the windows
> > > > executable, as it will need re-testing. I am not proposing that  
> > > > we be
> > > > impossibly fussy here - there are no actual changes of source code
> > > > here,
> > > > just how you build from source. Executables are unaltered.
> > > >
> > > > So if you can verify that the sources labelled 0.8.20 do build
> > > > correctly
> > > > on both platforms we are ready to release on Wednesday next, with  
> > > > the
> > > > already-built-and-tested windows executable. (This executable  
> > > > will not
> > > > be different if re-built, since the include file must have been
> > > > present,
> > > > and it would in any case not affect the resultant binary).
> > > >
> > > > I have some very good progress to check in now if you can move
> > > > master on
> > > > to 0.8.21, Anacrusis displaying properly, Breve, Longa and whole
> > > > measure
> > > > rests, even plain chant all doing the right thing in the Denemo
> > > > display
> > > > *and* the LilyPond!
> > > >
> > > > Richard
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > > > address@hidden
> > > > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel