denemo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo broken ....


From: Jeremiah Benham
Subject: Re: [Denemo-devel] Denemo broken ....
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 10:42:08 -0500

There was a warning saying the source file is more recent than executable. 
Rebuilding may fix it. Is this the mastet ir the soc branch?

Jeremiah

Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T

Ralf Mattes <address@hidden> wrote:

>On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 07:45:56 +0000, Ralf Mattes wrote:
>
>> Hello list,
>> 
>> after a git-pull (and autoreconf -vfi) denemo builds but fails to run:
>> 
>
>> Any ideas?
>> 
>
>Some desperate debugging later ... 
>Seems like denemo just segfaults (now: why don't I see this at the shell 
>prompt?
>Is someone really catching signals?). 
>Stacktrace is here:
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 0xb687f730 (LWP 19947)]
> jack_output_midi_event (buffer=0xbfe7e44b "ð\177\177\b\b\003\177\177", '@' 
> <repeats 12 times>, "÷", client_number=0, port_number=0)
>    at jackmidi.c:187
> warning: Source file is more recent than executable.
> 187     DenemoScore *si = Denemo.gui->si;
> (gdb)
>
>  
>Now:
> 
> (gdb) print Denemo.gui 
> $1 = (DenemoGUI *) 0x0
>
>Dereferencing this like here ' DenemoScore *si = Denemo.gui->si; ' of course 
>segfaults.
>
>BTW - why does denemo try to set/change the tuning _during startup_???
>
> #1  0x0808a9d2 in change_tuning (cents=0x81653c0) at midi.c:135
> #2  0x0810a64f in set_tuning () at pitchentry.c:1103
>
>That's a nuisance at least. Keep of my keyboard unless i ask you for it.
>(And it's silly on so many levels: midi might not be connected, my excellent 
>organ
>simulator (Aeolus) doesn't care about tuning messages ....).
>
> Cheers, RalfD
>
>  
>
>>  Cheers, RalfD
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Denemo-devel mailing list
>address@hidden
>https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]