denemo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Denemo-devel] Final version, with pdf defect?


From: Richard Shann
Subject: Re: [Denemo-devel] Final version, with pdf defect?
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 09:54:53 +0000

On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 19:27 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 15:55 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> > We can release. The gtk3 stuff is not ready yet

aargh! I was forgetting, this means that the evince stuff will not work
on any reasonably modern distro. Is there anything in problematic still
about the gtk3 port? Can I help?
Also, I should bump the version number of the .denemo file format (well
I need to check, but I think there are incompatibilities)

Richard




> . We can put it into the release after this one perhaps. So when shall I 
> create branch 0.9.4? Tarball release this sunday?
> Well, I'll try and update the docs this week and then we should
>       * copy the new features to the change log
>       * create the branch
>       * upload the candidate tarball to denemo.org
>       * download and test that it is ok
>       * final upload to ftp.gnu.org 
> We could aim for Sunday 13th November if you prefer a weekend, otherwise
> midweek is generally better for announcements.
> 
> Richard
> 
> 
> > 
> > Jeremiah
> > 
> > Sent from my Samsung smartphone on AT&T
> > 
> > Richard Shann <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> > >I have run the same LilyPond version under windows and generated the pdf
> > >http://www.denemo.org/dl31 which displays correctly in evince under
> > >linux and acrord32 under windows. It is also smaller because I have
> > >taken out all the point-and-click links.
> > >I think this is ready to go to press. However, until we make a release,
> > >very few people will be able to make use of the source file :(
> > >
> > >Any enthusiasm for a release?
> > >
> > >Richard
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 18:20 +0000, Richard Shann wrote:
> > >> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 11:30 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> > >> > On 11/03/2011 08:08 AM, Richard Shann wrote:
> > >> > > I have uploaded a final version of the Keyboard Polyphony example. 
> > >> > > The
> > >> > > pdf is
> > >> > > http://www.denemo.org/dl29
> > >> > >
> > >> > > and the source file is
> > >> > >
> > >> > > http://www.denemo.org/dl30
> > >> > >
> > >> > > this source has an include file, so you may need to run the Dynamic
> > >> > > Directive Refresh command before it will print (it is for the book
> > >> > > titles - re-doing the titles will also work, and nothing is needed if
> > >> > > you have installed to /usr/local).
> > >> > >
> > >> > > My PDF reader displays the treble clef wrongly, if you also see this 
> > >> > > and
> > >> > > have a recent version of LilyPond can you try re-printing it to see 
> > >> > > if
> > >> > > this is a bug that has been fixed. It does not show this problem in 
> > >> > > 20pt
> > >> > > font size, only 18 pt.
> > >> > 
> > >> > The treble cleff's did look fine for me at 18pt using lilypond 2.12.3.
> > >> Which viewer program did you use? I downloaded dl29 onto a windows
> > >> laptop and viewed it in Adobe reader. The treble clef was only slightly
> > >> broken on the right side of the top loop. The same file viewed with
> > >> evince and xpdf (which I think use the same underlying library) filled
> > >> in the top loop of the treble clef in black.
> > >> 
> > >> >  
> > >> > The pdf that you sent had distorted treble cleff's. What version of 
> > >> > lilypond do you have?
> > >> lilypond --version
> > >> GNU LilyPond 2.12.3
> > >> 
> > >> So that is quite strange - you get Denemo to generate a pdf via from
> > >> dl30 and it looks different to dl29, and yet we have the same installed
> > >> LilyPond... Hmm.
> > >> I'll try the LilyPond that is installed on my windows laptop.
> > >> Thanks for the feedback
> > >> Richard
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> > 
> > >> > Jeremiah
> > >> > 
> > >> > 
> > >> > > I have included a better epilog in this version, and fixed the final
> > >> > > chords to conform with the traditional appearance. The entire file is
> > >> > > created without inserting any special purpose LilyPond text, that is
> > >> > > just (now-standard) Denemo commands.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Richard
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > _______________________________________________
> > >> > > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > >> > > address@hidden
> > >> > > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> > >> > 
> > >> > 
> > >> > _______________________________________________
> > >> > Denemo-devel mailing list
> > >> > address@hidden
> > >> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> 
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Denemo-devel mailing list
> > >> address@hidden
> > >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
> > >
> > >
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Denemo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]