denemo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 1.0.8


From: Jeremiah Benham
Subject: Re: [Denemo-devel] Release 1.0.8
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:52:12 -0500

I can restart the release process. Is the fix in git? Should I recreate the branch or just checkout the changed file?

Jeremiah

On Aug 27, 2013 1:18 PM, "Richard Shann" <address@hidden> wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 12:15 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
> I updated the version numbers and created a branch.
I downloaded the 1.0.8 tarball you created in denemo.org/downloads and
built it as a new user. It seems fine apart from one minor issue. The
default startup scheme script (actions/Default.scm) creates buttons
using markup for the labels. I suspect this has gone in gtk3, as they
are not showing properly.
I don't mind re-starting the release process (it doesn't affect the
translations) if you are happy to, or to leave it as is.

Richard


> I am going to work on building librubberband in gub now.
>
> Jeremiah
>
> On Aug 27, 2013 9:29 AM, "Richard Shann" <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>         On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 08:24 -0500, Jeremiah Benham wrote:
>         > I am ready now. Gub is still relying on gtk2 and guile 1.8
>         for the
>         > binaries though.
>
>         >
>         That's fine, as long as I remember to check that the binaries
>         are
>         working ok. Have you been able to gub the librubberband yet? I
>         haven't
>         been able to build with gub since I updated to Debian Wheezy;
>         my next
>         attempt in that direction will be to start from scratch with
>         your github
>         but I haven't got to trying that yet - I seem to recall it is
>         quite a
>         battle. The rubberband library should build under gub ok,
>         though it may
>         need the .pc file patching (they wrote Cflags where they meant
>         CFlags
>         and so the include file wasn't found).
>
>         Richard
>
>         >
>         > Jeremiah
>         >
>         > On Aug 27, 2013 6:03 AM, "Richard Shann"
>         <address@hidden>
>         > wrote:
>         >         Even though we have only recently released 1.0.6 I
>         think we
>         >         should
>         >         proceed without delay to 1.0.8
>         >         One reason is because release 1.0.6 if built with
>         guile 2.0
>         >         will not
>         >         execute many commands, Upbeat in particular. I have
>         fixed this
>         >         since
>         >         moving on to guile 2 myself.
>         >         The other is, of course, the transcription from
>         Audio feature.
>         >
>         >         Please say when you are happy to push through
>         another release
>         >         and I will
>         >         update the po files in preparation.
>         >
>         >         Richard
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >         _______________________________________________
>         >         Denemo-devel mailing list
>         >         address@hidden
>         >         https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/denemo-devel
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]