[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [directory-discuss] s/w that requires a middleman to liberate it --
From: |
Adonay Felipe Nogueira |
Subject: |
Re: [directory-discuss] s/w that requires a middleman to liberate it -- is it free? |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Feb 2017 16:28:46 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hm... So it seems I have misread or accidentally skipped some replies,
because now I understand that we are explicitly talking about the GNU
FDL, and also about freedoom 0 as it seems.
While we discuss the possible GNU FDL violation, and also the possibiity
to completely disable this faulty CloudFlare feature, we must also note
that: the license is only given to those who actually get the
documentation, and freedom 0 applies once you get it, and also if we're
talking about freedom 0 for the software being used to get it then it
was already fullfilled because the
contracts/agreements/licenses/trademarks related to the software that
were given to you don't deny you such freedom 0. So in order to
understand how this licenses work you must shift the perspective from
the person who attempts to get it to the person who indeed has it
already.
- [directory-discuss] s/w that requires a middleman to liberate it -- is it free? (was: GNU R situation), (continued)
- [directory-discuss] s/w that requires a middleman to liberate it -- is it free? (was: GNU R situation), Anonymous, 2017/02/05
- [directory-discuss] s/w that requires a middleman to liberate it -- is it free?, Anonymous, 2017/02/10
- Re: [directory-discuss] s/w that requires a middleman to liberate it -- is it free?, Ineiev, 2017/02/11
- Re: [directory-discuss] s/w that requires a middleman to liberate it -- is it free?, Anonymous, 2017/02/18
- Re: [directory-discuss] s/w that requires a middleman to liberate it -- is it free?, Svetlana Tkachenko, 2017/02/19
- Re: [directory-discuss] s/w that requires a middleman to liberate it -- is it free?, Adonay Felipe Nogueira, 2017/02/14
- Re: [directory-discuss] s/w that requires a middleman to liberate it -- is it free?, Anonymous, 2017/02/18
- Re: [directory-discuss] s/w that requires a middleman to liberate it -- is it free?,
Adonay Felipe Nogueira <=
- Re: [directory-discuss] s/w that requires a middleman to liberate it -- is it free?, Svetlana Tkachenko, 2017/02/19
- [directory-discuss] Freedom 0 principles are not license-limited (was: s/w that requires a middleman..), Anonymous, 2017/02/20
- Re: [directory-discuss] Freedom 0 principles are not license-limited (was: s/w that requires a middleman..), Svetlana Tkachenko, 2017/02/20
- Re: [directory-discuss] Freedom 0 principles are not license-limited, Anonymous, 2017/02/23
- Re: [directory-discuss] Freedom 0 principles are not license-limited, Svetlana Tkachenko, 2017/02/23
- Re: [directory-discuss] s/w that requires a middleman to liberate it -- is it free?, Adonay Felipe Nogueira, 2017/02/21
- [directory-discuss] s/w that requires a middleman to liberate it -- is it free?, Anonymous, 2017/02/12
- Re: [directory-discuss] s/w that requires a middleman to liberate it -- is it free?, Svetlana Tkachenko, 2017/02/13
- Re: [directory-discuss] s/w that requires a middleman to liberate it -- is it free?, Ineiev, 2017/02/13
- Re: [directory-discuss] s/w that requires a middleman to liberate it -- is it free? (was: GNU R situation), Svetlana Tkachenko, 2017/02/05