[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [directory-discuss] Is a repo with just a COPYING file GPL-X-only or
Adonay Felipe Nogueira
Re: [directory-discuss] Is a repo with just a COPYING file GPL-X-only or GPL-X-or-later?
Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:26:54 -0300
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux)
Interesting question indeed.
There is also the main project file (with at least one of "main",
"start", "init", "[project name]" names, suffixed by a file
extension). This one might have what we look for.
However, I would take Bradley Kuhn's suggestion during a talk
In doubt, in order to be compliant, go for the worst.
So, I see two "worse" possibilities:
a. It's GNU GPL [Some number], only, not "or later".
b. It's not GNU GPL at all. This alternative is based on the assumption
that releasing a work without *clearly stating* the license places it in
default copyright license.
The reasoning behind alternative (b) can also extend to other other
licenses, and compliance to them also. As an example there is a recent
publication by Luis Villa, where he notes how to comply with the various
Creative Commons licenses in slides and presentations
is specially important and interesting because I see many people making
use of "Creative Commons" works (as these people call it) but failing to
give detailed attribution (preferably *in the work itself*), or failing
to comply with ShareAlike and NoDerivative variants (when they do
- Palestrante e consultor sobre /software/ livre (não confundir com
- "WhatsApp"? Ele não é livre, por isso não uso. Iguais a ele prefiro
Ring, ou Tox. Quer outras formas de contato? Adicione o vCard que
está no endereço acima aos teus contatos.
- Pretende me enviar arquivos .doc, .ppt, .cdr, ou .mp3? OK, eu
aceito, mas não repasso. Entrego apenas em formatos favoráveis ao
/software/ livre. Favor entrar em contato em caso de dúvida.
- "People said I should accept the world. Bullshit! I don't accept the
--- Richard Stallman