[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [directory-discuss] FSF opinion on chromium, QtWebEngine, electron

From: bill-auger
Subject: Re: [directory-discuss] FSF opinion on chromium, QtWebEngine, electron
Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 07:10:10 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0

On 11/05/2017 04:02 AM, David Hedlund wrote:
> Should Iridium be removed due to nonfree QtWebEngine?

david - it is the very point of this thread to determine that - as i
said, i gave atom and vscode only as examples - AFAIK this issue equally
affects all software derived from chromium, qtwebengine, or electron -
that includes irridium, ungoogled chromium, atom and vscode, qupzilla,
riot matrix, the qtwebengine library itself, and countless other programs

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]