|
From: | David Hedlund |
Subject: | Re: Replacement applications on nonfree systems |
Date: | Fri, 27 Aug 2021 13:36:43 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/78.11.0 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > Thanks, I added "we don't review single-platform free software for > proprietary operating systems. That is correct, but incomplete. To be complete, it should say this: We don't review free programs that don't run on GNU or GNU/Linux. If a program runs on two or more different nonfree platforms, we still do not review it. Even if it runs on BSD or Replicant, but not GNU or GNU/Linux, we still do not review it. We don't disapprove of them morally, but we don't study them because that would be outside the scope of our activity.
I will add that. But first, should this text be modified in
https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/Free_Software_Directory:Requirements#Free_programs
?
BSD is Unix-like. However, LibertyBSD is under evaluation
(https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Incoming_distros). If it gets
approved one day, should we extend the text to?:
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |