David Hedlund <public@beloved.name> writes:
It seems that there are two packages available for the
ath9k_htc is
a
Linux kernel driver (I linked to both above): "Firmware is
required,
which can be provided by installing the firmware-atheros
<https://packages.debian.org/firmware-atheros> package. Open
firmware
<https://wiki.debian.org/ath9k_htc/open_firmware> for this
driver is
also available in the firmware-ath9k-htc
<https://packages.debian.org/firmware-ath9k-htc> package
starting
from
Buster. " - https://wiki.debian.org/ath9k_htc
https://packages.debian.org/source/stable/open-ath9k-htc-firmware
is
the
source package used to build
https://packages.debian.org/bullseye/firmware-ath9k-htc
Thanks. A problem with using the debian name is other distros
may use
different names. For example the guix package of the same
firmware is
called ath9k-htc-firmware[1]. This is why I think using the
"official" name is better. Perhaps there's a way in an FSD
entry to
map a piece of software to corresponding packages in various
distros?
[1] https://guix.gnu.org/en/packages/ath9k-htc-firmware-1.4.0/
Not sure if this has been discussed before, but regarding John's
remark, this firmware, together with many others are in the
linux-firmware repo[2], which seems to be not part of the
kernel, so
perhaps it makes sense to add it to FSD:
[2]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/firmware/linux-firmware.git/tree/LICENCE.open-ath9k-htc-firmware
BTW, I'm not sure if the email address info@h-node.com is still
used
by anyone. If you feel like a message is relevant to h-node,
please
cc h-source-users@nongnu.org instead. That is the mailing list
we are
using for h-node.org and h-source (the server application of
h-node.org).