[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Direct Conversion vs Superheterodyne

From: Jim Smith
Subject: Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Direct Conversion vs Superheterodyne
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 07:03:20 -0600

For more reading on Direct Conversion, and some of its pitfalls as well
as its advantages, see August, 1992 and January, 1993 _QST_ articles by
Rick Campbell, amateur callsign KK7B.  He is an RF engineer who has done
some real in-depth study of optimizing direct conversion receivers on
the analog side.  

Good background reading.

On Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:52:17 -0600
Crusty Curmudgeon <address@hidden> wrote:

> Ok.. a direct conversion receiver is simple and cheap, but I think
> there are some flies in the ointment too:


Jim Smith

If you're not part of the Solution,
you're part of the Precipitate!

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]