[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Change request - VrSigProc.h
From: |
Rob Judd |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Change request - VrSigProc.h |
Date: |
Wed, 06 Aug 2003 04:41:47 +1000 |
Krzysztof,
I have them. I've used them. I've beaten them to death on every kind of
C code imaginable. I've also done the same with Borland 3.1, Borland
5.5, msvc 4, rsxnt, lcc-win32, djgpp and god only knows what else.
I even built my own console compiler from lcc-4.1 and if you check the
Priceton repository I think my code is still in there.
So, when you ask me a loaded question like this, what am I to say?
;-)
Rob
Krzysztof Kamieniecki wrote:
>
> Can I ask why are you using MSVC instead of MINGW and/or CYGWIN.
>
> Quoting Rob Judd <address@hidden>:
>
> > static const int MARK_ALREADY = 2; //!< all data is already
> > computed
> > static const int MARK_READY = 1; //!< data is ready to be
> > computed (and has been
> >
> > marked)
> > static const int MARK_READY_NO_MARK = 0;//!< data is ready on this
> > level or above,
> > // but no further data should be
> > marked
> > static const int MARK_NO_READY = -1; //!< no data is ready to be
> > computed
> > static const int MARK_THREAD = -2; //!< data is marked by
> > another
> > thread
> > static const int MARK_continue = -3; //!< flag distinct from all
> > others (keep last)
> >
> >
> > Pure specifiers should be inside a function, and MSVC won't accept it
> > even if GNUC does. I'll leave the recoding to the experts. ;-)
> >
> > Rob
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio