[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Decimation
From: |
Prateek Dayal |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] Decimation |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Nov 2004 11:21:53 +0000 |
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 15:07:54 -0700, Dan Gisselquist
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Any comments? Yeah.
>
> I had a similar conversation with my instructor two years ago. He
> basically said that wavelets were the ideal way of breaking the world
> into time and frequency. Be aware, however, wavelets do not divide the
> world into equal time and frequency "bins". They are biased towards
> high frequency resolution for low frequencies, while at the same time
> achieving low time resolution for the same low frequencies. Towards
> the higher frequency end of the scale, wavelets are often used to
> provide very precise time resolution at the expense of frequency
> resolution. Applications for wavelets are numerous.
>
> However (my two cents), wavelets are not as appropriate for examining
> the electromagnetic spectrum. In particular, the assumption that
> higher frequencies need more time resolution is rendered invalid by a
> frequency agile communications system (something where the carrier
> frequency can be placed anywhere).
>
> IMHO, decimation always requires an antialiasing low-pass filter
> coupled with the actual decimator. Two primary implementations exist.
> The first filters and then decimates, the second couples the two
> operations together so that the only filter outputs computed are the
> valid outputs of the decimator. The differences between these two
> approaches, in terms of computational cost, can be very dramatic.
Which approach does GNU Radio take ???
>
> While you could use the wavelet transform to perform the same
> operation, it would only make sense if you wanted multiple outputs as a
> result. For example, the wavelet transform might make sense if you
> wanted to separate the input into multiple different streams at
> (likely) different rates.
>
> Other approaches, such as those using a DFT filter banks, make a lot
> more sense when you want equally spaced frequency bins for reasons
> discussed above. If you'd like, I can provide some really good
> references for how to do this well ...
>
> Just my two cents,
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
> On 11/19/2004 10:54:21 AM, Prateek Dayal wrote:
> > Hi ,
> >
> > I saw that in GNU Radio, decimation is carried out after using an
> > antialiasing low pass filter. In a discussion a professor at my
> > institute suggested that we can use wavelets for decimation and
> > interpolation ....
> >
> > any comments ???
> >
> > --
> > Prateek Dayal
> > B.Tech 4th Year
> > ECE
> > IIT Guwahati
> >
> > www.geocities.com/pmd_iitgw
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> >
>
--
Prateek Dayal
B.Tech 4th Year
ECE
IIT Guwahati
www.geocities.com/pmd_iitgw