[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] signals/atsc question
From: |
Eric Blossom |
Subject: |
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] signals/atsc question |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:10:02 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 09:59:34AM -0500, Marcus Leech wrote:
>
> Sample-size reduction, in order to increase effective bandwidth up to the
> computer, would be of great benefit for radio astronomy work. The
> big observatories that are sampling many hundreds of Mhz at a time
> typically use digitizers with a couple of bits of resolution. They
> can get
> away with this because they're using dedicated r.a. bands, and fairly
> good filters (and remote locations!).
>
> If you have 4 samples per byte, your observable bandwidth improves
> quite a bit :-)
This wouldn't be too hard to implement. It just changes to code that
packs that data for transport across the USB.
Eric
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] signals/atsc question, (continued)
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] signals/atsc question, John Gilmore, 2005/03/02
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] signals/atsc question, Ilia Mirkin, 2005/03/02
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] signals/atsc question, Eric Blossom, 2005/03/02
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] signals/atsc question, David Willmore, 2005/03/14
- RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] signals/atsc question, Robert McGwier, 2005/03/15
- Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] signals/atsc question, Eric Blossom, 2005/03/16
- RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] signals/atsc question, Chuck Swiger, 2005/03/16
- RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] signals/atsc question, Matt Ettus, 2005/03/17
- RE: [Discuss-gnuradio] signals/atsc question, Robert McGwier, 2005/03/17
Re: [Discuss-gnuradio] signals/atsc question, Marcus Leech, 2005/03/02